Mediation and arbitration
Most injury cases are resolved somewhere other than a courtroom. Two processes come up most often: mediation, which is a structured negotiation, and arbitration, which is a private trial. They are not the same thing, and the difference matters.
It is general information, not legal advice.
Mediation
A mediation is a settlement negotiation run by a neutral third person, usually a retired judge or an experienced lawyer. Each side typically starts in its own room. The mediator carries offers, arguments, and reality checks back and forth, pressing each side on the weak points of its position. The mediator has no power to decide anything. The case settles only if you agree to a number, and if it does, you sign a settlement agreement that day.
Mediation usually happens after enough discovery that both sides can value the case — often after depositions. Courts frequently order it before setting a trial date.
Why it is confidential
California law makes statements and documents prepared for or made during a mediation inadmissible and not subject to discovery in later litigation. Neither side can later tell the judge or jury what the other side said or offered in the mediation. That protection is deliberate: it lets both sides and the mediator talk frankly about weaknesses without it being used against them.
Sources: Evid. Code, § 1119 (mediation confidentiality).
Arbitration
In arbitration, a private arbitrator hears evidence and argument, much like a bench trial, and then issues a decision. Whether that decision is binding depends on the agreement that sent the dispute to arbitration. Arbitration is usually faster and less formal than court, the rules of evidence are relaxed, and the right to appeal a binding award is very limited.
Uninsured and underinsured motorist arbitration
The most common place an injury client meets arbitration is a claim against their own auto insurer for uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits. California auto policies generally require that disputes over whether the other driver was at fault, and how much the injured person is owed, be decided by arbitration rather than a lawsuit. The arbitrator decides fault and damages up to the policy limit.
Related: underinsured motorist claims.
Contractual arbitration clauses
Some agreements — certain rideshare terms, nursing-home admission packets, gym and activity waivers — try to require arbitration of injury claims. Whether such a clause is enforceable is often itself a fight, and it depends on how the clause was presented and what it covers.
Common questions
- What is the difference between mediation and arbitration?
- A mediator helps the two sides negotiate a settlement but cannot decide anything — you only settle if you agree. An arbitrator acts like a private judge and decides the outcome, which is binding if the arbitration agreement says so.
- Is what I say in mediation confidential?
- Yes. California law makes almost everything said or written for a mediation inadmissible and undiscoverable later (Evid. Code § 1119). That protection is what lets both sides speak candidly.
- Do I have to go to mediation?
- Courts commonly order the parties to a settlement conference or mediation before trial. It does not force a settlement — you can leave without an agreement and still take the case to trial.
- When would my case go to arbitration?
- Most often in an uninsured or underinsured motorist claim, where the auto policy requires arbitration of disputes with your own insurer. Some other contracts also require arbitration. A standard injury claim against an at-fault driver goes to court unless both sides agree otherwise.
Start a case review call
On a case review call, I go through the facts with you: what happened, when, whether you were hurt, whether anyone represents you, and how to reach you. It is not legal advice, and I will not put a value on your claim.